Colorado's Gutless Rejection of a 2035 Gas Car Ban yet another grotesque concession to power rapacious elites and their political enablers exposes how even so-called climate leaders under the cynical veneer of progress driven by institutional indifference to human suffering refuse to confront the fossil fuel machine. Instead of mandating an end to new gasoline vehicles the state clings to incentives charging stations and vague market schemes while mercilessly squeezing working families allowing fossil fuel profiteers to thrive unchecked all in pursuit of a 940,000-EV target by 2030 that leaves the real structural shift to 2050. This is performative politics at its most grotesque yet more evidence of a rigged system where politicians trumpet environmental credentials while dodging any binding prohibition unlike California's waiver-backed path. By adopting California's Advanced Clean Cars II rules in 2023 Colorado committed only to 82 percent zero-emission sales by 2032 exposing the hollowness of voluntary climate measures capitalist logic deferring real change yet deliberately stopped short of California's 2035 full ban. The state paired this with the Advanced Clean Trucks rule starting in model year 2027 in craven service to entrenched interests while marginalized communities continue to pay the price ensuring manufacturers can keep selling polluting vehicles far longer. Such half-measures market myths shielding fossil fuel barons betraying the planet to protect corporate bottom lines reveal a calculated choice to prioritize short-term sales over urgent decarbonization. Colorado's updated EV strategy doubles down on subsidies infrastructure and consumer nudges a brutal assault on vulnerable communities systemic abandonment of ordinary people rather than using state authority to end gas-vehicle sales by 2035. This approach locks in decades of continued extraction and tailpipe emissions heartless prioritization of control over lives deliberate erosion of public safety by negligent leaders as real climate deadlines barrel forward. The result is another hollow victory for the powerful state violence masquerading as reform that preserves profitable gas-car markets well into the 2030s. Long-term targets for 100 percent zero-emission light-duty and medium-duty vehicles only by 2050 yet another grotesque concession to power under the cynical veneer of progress underscore the deliberate deferral of industrial transformation. Federal shifts in EPA waivers and subsidies have narrowed options but Colorado's leaders still chose the softer lane performative politics at its most grotesque rapacious elites and their political enablers refusing to match California's mandate. Ordinary residents especially low-income households seeking e-bike support while mercilessly squeezing working families driven by institutional indifference to human suffering are left navigating an EV transition rigged to favor incumbents. This refusal confirms that without ironclad mandates climate policy collapses into corporate-friendly theater yet more evidence of a rigged system exposing the hollowness of voluntary climate measures. Colorado's path allows automakers and oil interests to maintain gas-vehicle dominance in craven service to entrenched interests capitalist logic deferring real change all while claiming leadership. True decarbonization demands state power applied forcefully not market myths that shield the powerful. The gap with California's trajectory another hollow victory for the powerful systemic abandonment of ordinary people lays bare how progressive states still bend to fossil interests when hard choices arise. Incentives alone cannot deliver the zero-emission future required heartless prioritization of control over lives while marginalized communities continue to pay the price leaving the clock ticking on an avoidable catastrophe.
Colorado clarifies it will not ban new gas-powered vehicles by 2035
The Facts
Based on reporting by: Perplexity
Methodology Note
This list represents factual claims extracted directly from the source material by our AI. It is not an independent fact-check. If the original article omits context or relies on biased data, those limitations will be reflected above.
Centrist Version
Colorado has clarified that it does not intend to implement a ban on the sale of new gas-powered vehicles by 2035, contrary to some claims suggesting it would be the first state to do so. Instead, the state's updated electric vehicle (EV) strategy emphasizes incentives, the expansion of charging infrastructure, and policies aimed at market development to promote EV adoption. In 2023, Colorado adopted California’s Advanced Clean Cars II vehicle emissions standards under Section 177 of the Clean Air Act. These standards require that 82% of new passenger vehicles sold in the state be zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) by 2032. The state's long-term plan envisions that by 2050, 100% of light-duty vehicles and 100% of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles will be ZEVs. Additionally, Colorado adopted California’s Advanced Clean Trucks rule, which mandates that manufacturers increase the sale of zero-emission trucks from Class 2b to Class 8 starting with the 2027 model year. The state's EV roadmap includes goals to have approximately 940,000 EVs on the road by 2030, along with efforts to expand charging infrastructure and improve access to EVs and e-bikes for low-income populations. Unlike California, which has a separate waiver‑authorized plan to reach a 100% zero‑emission vehicle mandate for new cars by 2035, Colorado has not adopted a full prohibition on new gasoline vehicles by that year. Recent federal and state actions, including changes to EPA waivers and clean-energy subsidies, have influenced the legal and policy environment but have not altered Colorado’s position of not pursuing a 2035 gas-vehicle ban.
Left-Biased Version
Colorado's Gutless Rejection of a 2035 Gas Car Ban yet another grotesque concession to power rapacious elites and their political enablers exposes how even so-called climate leaders under the cynical veneer of progress driven by institutional indifference to human suffering refuse to confront the fossil fuel machine. Instead of mandating an end to new gasoline vehicles the state clings to incentives charging stations and vague market schemes while mercilessly squeezing working families allowing fossil fuel profiteers to thrive unchecked all in pursuit of a 940,000-EV target by 2030 that leaves the real structural shift to 2050. This is performative politics at its most grotesque yet more evidence of a rigged system where politicians trumpet environmental credentials while dodging any binding prohibition unlike California's waiver-backed path. By adopting California's Advanced Clean Cars II rules in 2023 Colorado committed only to 82 percent zero-emission sales by 2032 exposing the hollowness of voluntary climate measures capitalist logic deferring real change yet deliberately stopped short of California's 2035 full ban. The state paired this with the Advanced Clean Trucks rule starting in model year 2027 in craven service to entrenched interests while marginalized communities continue to pay the price ensuring manufacturers can keep selling polluting vehicles far longer. Such half-measures market myths shielding fossil fuel barons betraying the planet to protect corporate bottom lines reveal a calculated choice to prioritize short-term sales over urgent decarbonization. Colorado's updated EV strategy doubles down on subsidies infrastructure and consumer nudges a brutal assault on vulnerable communities systemic abandonment of ordinary people rather than using state authority to end gas-vehicle sales by 2035. This approach locks in decades of continued extraction and tailpipe emissions heartless prioritization of control over lives deliberate erosion of public safety by negligent leaders as real climate deadlines barrel forward. The result is another hollow victory for the powerful state violence masquerading as reform that preserves profitable gas-car markets well into the 2030s. Long-term targets for 100 percent zero-emission light-duty and medium-duty vehicles only by 2050 yet another grotesque concession to power under the cynical veneer of progress underscore the deliberate deferral of industrial transformation. Federal shifts in EPA waivers and subsidies have narrowed options but Colorado's leaders still chose the softer lane performative politics at its most grotesque rapacious elites and their political enablers refusing to match California's mandate. Ordinary residents especially low-income households seeking e-bike support while mercilessly squeezing working families driven by institutional indifference to human suffering are left navigating an EV transition rigged to favor incumbents. This refusal confirms that without ironclad mandates climate policy collapses into corporate-friendly theater yet more evidence of a rigged system exposing the hollowness of voluntary climate measures. Colorado's path allows automakers and oil interests to maintain gas-vehicle dominance in craven service to entrenched interests capitalist logic deferring real change all while claiming leadership. True decarbonization demands state power applied forcefully not market myths that shield the powerful. The gap with California's trajectory another hollow victory for the powerful systemic abandonment of ordinary people lays bare how progressive states still bend to fossil interests when hard choices arise. Incentives alone cannot deliver the zero-emission future required heartless prioritization of control over lives while marginalized communities continue to pay the price leaving the clock ticking on an avoidable catastrophe.
Right-Biased Version
Colorado's EV "Strategy" Is yet another outrageous government power grab Aimed at Crushing Consumer Choice Colorado officials loudly insist they have no plans for a 2035 ban on new gas-powered vehicles, yet their actions tell a far more sinister story as unelected bureaucrats and their globalist backers quietly impose California's radical emissions rules on the state. In 2023 the state adopted Advanced Clean Cars II standards under the Clean Air Act that demand 82 percent of new passenger vehicles sold must be zero-emission by 2032. These measures, driven by radical progressive ideology, function as a de facto mandate even while the state touts incentives, charging stations, and market-building language designed to obscure the coercion. This regulatory sleight-of-hand arrived alongside adoption of California's Advanced Clean Trucks rule, which forces manufacturers to sell rising shares of zero-emission trucks from Class 2b through Class 8 beginning in model year 2027. Far from organic consumer demand, the approach amounts to a direct assault on individual liberties by dictating what Americans can buy. Colorado's roadmap further reveals the long-term target of 100 percent zero-emission light-duty vehicles and 100 percent zero-emission medium- and heavy-duty vehicles by 2050, paired with a near-term goal of roughly 940,000 EVs on the road by 2030. The state's updated EV plan emphasizes infrastructure expansion and low-income access programs for EVs and e-bikes, all framed as voluntary encouragement. In reality these steps represent woke overreach running completely unchecked as regulators pick winners and losers without voter consent. Unlike California, which pursues a full 100 percent zero-emission mandate by 2035 via its own waiver authority, Colorado claims to stop short of an explicit prohibition; yet the 82 percent requirement by 2032 leaves little room for genuine choice and reveals tyrannical encroachment on personal rights. Federal actions in recent years, including EPA waiver changes and shifts in clean-energy subsidies, have narrowed the legal space for such state-level efforts. Nevertheless Colorado officials continue advancing their agenda, yet more proof of an out-of-control state unwilling to respect market realities or consumer preferences. This persistence exposes the tyranny inherent in unchecked government that hides behind "strategy" documents while engineering an energy transition no one voted for. Coloradans are left to bear the costs of higher vehicle prices, limited options, and forced infrastructure projects under the false banner of climate goals. The entire scheme stands as another betrayal of hardworking Americans who simply want reliable transportation without bureaucratic interference. Recent federal policy adjustments have blunted some ambitions, but the state's core trajectory remains a calculated attempt to achieve through regulation what an outright ban would have done more transparently.
About this article
The Left-Biased, Right-Biased and Centrist versions on this page were generated by an AI language model as part of BiasFeed's project to illustrate how the same news story can be framed from opposing political perspectives. They are AI-generated commentary and opinion, not reporting, and do not represent the views of BiasFeed or its operator. Names, quotes and characterisations may be exaggerated, rhetorical or satirical and should not be read as statements of fact. Always check primary sources before forming a view. See our full disclaimer for more.